The Free Culture Movement's agenda is freedom of information generally available to society, but especially in view of the capabilities of infomation technology this would allow massive dissemination. Those who adhere to this philosophy see the cultural items of others, sounds being just a small section of what they offer, as raw material in itself and belonging to no one, simply to be used to whatever ends. Their intent is to stimulate hybrid forms, and to lead to new insights and new beauties. Herbie Hancock's piece of music would be an example of such a hybridization, and it did not benefit the pygmy from whom he got the inspiration.
Those opposed to Free Culture, in its many forms, feel that the raided cultures deserve payment, and deserve the option to stay diverse, separate and unalloyed with any form of Western contamination. They find collaborations to be no improvement over the original, and would prefer that the culture invaded be left alone to grow in its own way. At the very least, the artists whose works are emulated, in their eyes, should be fully compensated. However, a key difficulty is that the cultural exchange is just that, it's an exchange, and not only would funds pass to the group, but mores, icons, foodstuffs, habits and other behaviors not previously known in their society would work their way into their lives. The collaborative works of Baka Beyond would be a good example of hybridization, however in this case the mined culture's members did benefit to some degree in a remunerative sense, but all of these interactions with Westerners have changed the pygmy livestyle profoundly. It is this kind of contamination that the counter-Free Culture folk fear for the world's aboriginal cultures.
Thus, I am torn. I do love access to these musics. But I also realize that my opportunity to listen to it risks the peoples from whom it comes to be inundated with McDonalds and KFC.